|
|
My Integral Leap of Faith
-
07-22-2008, 7:45 PM |
-
madyogi
-
-
-
Joined on 07-18-2008
-
Little Rock, AR
-
Posts 10
-
Points 285
-
|
My Integral Leap of Faith
Recently there was a thread in Embodied Practice called The
Integral Church of AQAL that got all kinds of off track, and there was an
interest expressed in continuing the discussion here in Theory Au Naturel.
This is my modest attempt to continue that discussion.
So, this thread is called “My Integral Leap of Faith.” To frame the discussion, I’ll first define
faith as I intend to discuss it … just so we’re all on the same page. I’ll begin by quoting a fellow integralist
who calls himself greenwoods. In another
thread called, “Is Faith a Level or a Line?” he said, “I define faith in one
way as being the elements of the unknown that we do not feel the need to
explore because we are satisfied with what we already know,” and further, “I
don’t need to know the workings of anti-matter to know that I feel love for
another. I also feel that connecting with others is an evolutionary
process and the art of doing this well will take up enough time. So,
faith is very useful in not wasting productive time.”
With all this in mind, I’d like to point out that, as Paul
Tillich has also pointed out, faith is an act of personality. As such, there is always a
personal/developmental aspect to faith. It
sort of follows you up and down the spiral, and whatever leaps you’re able to
make will depend on your worldview, will vary based on the understanding you’ve
gained from experience. So the idea of
faith I will use moving forward in this conversation is one that is mutable, one
that develops as your understanding grows from more experience. In this sense, I suppose faith is a line, but
it’s also a state available at each level.
It is informed and molded as each (again in greenwoods’ words) “critical
threshold in understanding and acceptance is reached at a given level of
development in the spiritual and/or cognitive line.”
So faith is an act of acceptance that each personality makes
at each individual stage of development to 1) consolidate the sum of
experiential understanding into personal RAM, and 2) avoid the overwhelming and
impossible task of exploring every little detail of everything at any given
point.
This leads me to the integral leap. For me, Tillich’s idea of faith as an act of
the entire personality to accept and affirm the ultimate Ground of Being is a
very highly developed faith indeed. This
to me is the integral, second-tier leap of faith. As any integral seeker who doesn’t live in a
commune filled with other integral seekers knows, most people in the world don’t
confirm this faith. This is why it is
for my personality an absolute leap. My
understanding (thanks to ILP, ITP, etc) confirms it, but my daily interactions
in the world run counter to it.
Still, I know that all apparently separate things in
existence are simply manifestations of Godhead trapped in spacetime, just as
each individual wave on the ocean is made of the same salt water. I understand that Godhead is the only One,
and the only One is true, unadulterated love.
And that to live in that love is to live wholly without blame or guilt.
I know all this even though 97% of the signals that bombard
me from the world at large, and from my own pesky ego, tell me otherwise. This is a leap of faith in my eyes - an integral
leap of faith. It is only this faith
that keeps me from plunging back into the perils of egocentrism. This faith is a deep well within which I most
of the time manage to drown my ego and take the deepest personal plunge in
Spirit I possibly can.
Have you any thoughts?
Philip | BrickhouseBodymind.com"Honesty in pursuit and tenacity of purpose will bring you to your goal." - Maharaj
|
|
-
07-25-2008, 6:30 PM |
-
grrlrighter
-
-
-
Joined on 08-08-2006
-
New Jersey
-
Posts 9
-
Points 165
-
|
Re: My Integral Leap of Faith
Excellent! Thanks, madyogi, for getting this ball rolling. ![Smile [:)]](/Public/cs/emoticons/emotion-1.gif) First, the personal/developmental aspect. I see this as akin to mountain climbing; I have faith that I can get to that next plateau, and that's what keeps me climbing; but when I indeed to reach it, it looks much different (and usually much greater!) than I imagined it to be. And then my strategy and imagination for the next plateau becomes reconsidered and reformed. I think this sounds like your Tillich example of faith as an act of personality. And I don't know that this is a conscious thing; I can just look back on my life so far (or down the mountain, if you will) and see how differently I've coped in situations, how differently I've viewed the world, etc. Now, I can be conscious that wherever I am now, this too shall pass. I can't know what lies ahead for my perspective, but I can imagine, and climb the ladder made of such visions. Then when I get there, I'll turn back and watch the ladder turn to dust, and another, different ladder will appear ahead of me. So I think that actually climbing that ladder is the act of faith. (Too many climbing analogies! Sorry.) I have much more to say about the Integral leap of faith, and the pesky ego ![Smile [:)]](/Public/cs/emoticons/emotion-1.gif) but my brain just froze up. I'll be back tomorrow after I let this marinate a bit longer!
|
|
-
08-02-2008, 8:04 AM |
-
madyogi
-
-
-
Joined on 07-18-2008
-
Little Rock, AR
-
Posts 10
-
Points 285
-
|
Re: My Integral Leap of Faith
I think you make a good point grrlrighter. Just climbing the ladder is in some way the leap of faith. One must, at every level, find ways to feel enabled in order to continue the climb. Otherwise, at the first setback or broken rung, the first fall into a cravasse, we lose hope. I also feel like faith and hope are somehow intertwined. More later...
Philip | BrickhouseBodymind.com"Honesty in pursuit and tenacity of purpose will bring you to your goal." - Maharaj
|
|
-
08-04-2008, 9:15 AM |
-
grrlrighter
-
-
-
Joined on 08-08-2006
-
New Jersey
-
Posts 9
-
Points 165
-
|
Re: My Integral Leap of Faith
Hey madyogi, check this out; it's an essay on Faith by Robert Augustus Masters, from his website... it pretty much nails my view of faith, and then blows it out of the box. I found it by surfing through Adastra's posts on Gaia =)
After reading this, I'd love to get back to the discussion of how faith fits into an ILP. Especially in the context of reading this article... it so beautifully articulates the ineffable. I love how he lines up faith and hope in the middle of the essay!
| |
|
Faith is radical trust in action. Trust in what? In Being, in our own Buddha-Nature, in What-Really-Matters. We may not see It, we may not hear It, we may stray far from It, but through faith we open to the recognition that It – however invisible It may seem to be to us – is ever with us, regardless of our thoughts to the contrary.
Faith is intimacy with not-knowing.
 F. Rassouli ( www.rassouli.com )
Faith is forged in the crucible of our suffering, emerging as a dynamic openness that helps us navigate those zones of ourselves commonly submerged in darkness, despair, and depression. The presence of faith, however, doesn’t necessarily mean we will have clear sailing or an easy time. Even when our faith is strong, we may still find ourselves down in the mud on our hands and knees, but not so inclined to make ego-suffused drama out of our situation.
Faith responds to problems, but not on the level at which they occur. That is, faith assumes a nonproblematic orientation to problems, providing a spiritually intimate openness that holds us and our areas of concern with great care.
This openness – a sacred enfolding – contains without binding, and releases without abandoning. Its value is verified by direct participation in it. Direct experience, not belief, provides the relevant data or material – physical and otherwise – through which faith is cultivated, known, appreciated, and more deeply known.
Faith is not a kind of belief or cognitive exercise; it is much deeper than any mental construction. And nor is faith merely a type of hope – hope is rooted in the future, faith in the present.
Where hope promises, faith gives. Where hope dreams, faith awakens.
Where hope is nostalgia for the future, faith is acceptance of the now.
And this is not a blind, defeatist, narrow, misguided, or submissive acceptance, but it is an acceptance nevertheless – and a largely unresisting acceptance – unpolluted by hope and other romancings of tomorrow.
Faith deepens through situations that test it. Without such conditions, faith remains in the shallows.
Pain comes with Life; what better use to make of pain than to deepen our faith? Instead of turning our pain into suffering – that is, dramatizing it, with us playing victim or pawn to it – we can use its energies to fuel our way into a deeper life, a life abundant with faith. Then suffering is not so much a fall from Grace as it is Grace in its dark, deglamorized disguise, providing the very conditions through which we can more fully awaken from the entrapping dreams we habitually populate.
There is perhaps no more worthy gift to have than unshakable faith.
What does such faith mean? First, a strongly felt connection to Being, in conjunction with the recognition that that connection still exists at those times when we don’t feel it. Second, a non-despairing abandoning of all hope of fruition, an unforced letting go of being invested and caught up in particular outcomes. Third, a developing of the kind of patience that waits without waiting, that endures without having to have a clear endpoint. Fourth, a dynamic embracing of not-knowing, honoring the knowledge-transcending Mystery of Being. Fifth, accepting what is exactly as it is, including one’s feelings and intentions and actions regarding it. And, last but not least, cultivating gratitude for what one currently has, including the ability to develop faith.
Faith makes us feel good even about not feeling good.
If our faith is well-rooted, we usually do not forget it for long – we cannot help but remember what gives us faith, even when our remembering is gray, thick, or far from stable. Faith is not an antidote to our suffering, but rather a compassionate space for it, wherein we can more clearly hear and sanely respond to what our pain is saying to us.
Although faith may not make pain go away, it changes our relationship to it in such a way that we’re less likely to turn our pain into suffering. So faith does not necessarily still the storm, but allows us to be with it – and to become intimate with it – without losing track of What-Really-Matters. Spiritual stamina.
Faith teaches us not to control, but to let be. This is not mere passivity nor some sort of spiritualized irresponsibility, but rather a kind of potent quietness or stillness out of which can emerge fitting action, choices made by something wiser than our minds. When our faith is strong, the necessity of the situation is the only catalyst we need.
Faith is frequently made synonymous with what is commonly referred to as “blind faith.” But real faith is far from blind; though it may sometimes lack clear vision, it knows the way by heart, even if it has to inch along on its belly through the sniper fire of doubt.
Faith allows us to live sanely and compassionately in the midst of all that is happening. Bad days don’t destroy or cripple it.
In fact, bad days actually strengthen it. So for faith, suffering is not just bad news. However, the presence of faith does not mean an end to difficult states – as in some fantasy of saintly detachment – but rather an appropriate context for them. Bringing things to an end is not the point – radical trust in Being is.
Faith is the unresisting embodiment of such trust. Faith is the highest form of devotion. Faith is the heartland of sacred patience, explaining nothing and revealing much. Through it, we find the necessary energy and endurance for the most significant journey of all. Faith knows the way by heart. |
|
|
-
08-04-2008, 11:13 AM |
-
serengetiplains
-
-
-
Joined on 12-20-2007
-
Vancouver Canada
-
Posts 31
-
Points 395
-
|
Re: My Integral Leap of Faith
Hey grrl, love Robert's phrase "radical trust"! Faith is of course a close relative to trust, the two being practically identical etymologically. Interestingly enough, the words "tree" and "true" derive from the same root from which we get "trust," suggesting that faith and truth are closely related and that, as the reference to "tree" implies, these things are solidly rooted in the ground and last.
I like to conceive of faith (or trust) as describing the disposition the knowing side of me takes toward my being, in which an entire universe of tacit knowledge resides. Without my knowing: my heart pumps day in and day out, in its own tacit knowing; my skin lives its life and, among other things, heals itself, rather mysteriously, in its own tacit knowing; every electron in my body is what it is beyond but a small iota of my (and the best of the entirety of quantum mechanic's) knowing, in its own tacit knowing. Understanding this relation of my knowledge to being knowledge, why not go the distance and trust my being knows what direction to take for "my" life generally? And to trust that anything that arises carries the trace of this direction? What might giving assent to this require more than a certain faithful listening and acceptance?
|
|
|
|