|
|
Jill Bolte Taylor on TED Talks and NPR
-
07-01-2008, 8:04 AM |
-
georgeshep
-
-
-
Joined on 08-18-2006
-
Chapel Hill NC
-
Posts 4
-
Points 65
-
|
Jill Bolte Taylor on TED Talks and NPR
|
-
07-01-2008, 9:02 AM |
-
ambosuno
-
-
-
Joined on 10-30-2006
-
So Cal
-
Posts 652
-
Points 10,355
-
|
Re: Jill Bolte Taylor on TED Talks and NPR
|
-
07-29-2008, 1:35 PM |
-
serengetiplains
-
-
-
Joined on 12-20-2007
-
Vancouver Canada
-
Posts 31
-
Points 395
-
|
George, I found Jill's experience quite interesting. Her stroke, as she competently explained, literally shut off her language centre, which apparently then allowed her right brain to direct or stamp the very quality of her experience. That experience, from her description, very closely, in my perception, parallels what I've read of Being or so-called enlightenment (better: enlightening) experiences from several sources: Maharshi, Nisargadatta, Eckhart, Genpo Roshi, etc.
In two interviews recorded after her TED talk, Jill speaks to this parallel, suggesting the core element in the experience is, to use a Rumi poem title, to shut the language door.
Notice one implication of her experience: the Being state of awareness, or enlightenment, or call it what you will, carries an UR correlate of right-brain activity or prominence. From where I sit as regards brain understanding, which is from afar, if left brain is time and action and part (and worry and so-called ego and all that), right brain is space and being and whole/wave. Left brain is perhaps quantum, right brain relativity.
Jill's experience also, to me, implies that the Maharshi (if I can be so general) experience of Oneness-Non-Separateness of the Universal All is itself ... partial: the expression of but one half of the brain. Now there's an implication worth pondering (hint, leads to Genpo Roshi's threefold architecture).
|
|
-
07-29-2008, 6:09 PM |
-
serengetiplains
-
-
-
Joined on 12-20-2007
-
Vancouver Canada
-
Posts 31
-
Points 395
-
|
Let's muse a little further. But first, allow me a quote from Nisargadatta from the last year of his life. We might suppose this quote arises from his mature view:
M: The manifest dynamic nature, don't stamp it with words! Don't conceptualize. Now everybody is weighed down by words ...
V: So words are the only problem.
M: Yes. The whole problem is with the words.
Shut the language door! If I can interpolate a little: shut the language door slash left brain particle so-called ego self, open non-conceptual perception slash right brain "wave" "self." In case you're wondering, the quotation marks are my typed form of disappearing everything they encapsulate, immediately.
Adopting this simplification, a question arising for me is this: is the RB"W""S" non-dual? My intuition thinks perhaps not, that non-duality is perhaps found in a, call it what you will, L+R perspective, view, understanding, experience, reality, synthesis, whatever whatever. A little evidence that this might be true can be seen in the following *very* common non-dual (not to mention routinely capitalized) pronouncements from the right brain region: my "Self" is the "True Self," is "Reality," is the "True Nature," is the non-illusory, non-mayic Absolute Ground of All. One might, from these and other issuings (like that heavy, stuck notion of Enlightenment), think the right brain thinks it's view is pretty darn There, or Now, or Whatever---got the Real Goods, in other words. Which is not to say I don't appreciate the peace of space consciousness, just that its All is perhaps not all. Jill's experience might be seen to point this direction. : )
|
|
|
|