hi towers1209 and marushia
me too!
it's like being with all your friends but feeling really lonely.
towers, what you say about 'personal ownership' rings for me. if i try and communicate the amazing ( to me!) discovery of KWs work using his language i too, fall flat on my face. it just doesn't sound real at best; at worst my friends just stare in bafflement. (actually, the've been doing that a lot- i shouldn't blame Ken!) i wonder at my own grasp; the details are so tactile in my mind, but to put it into words just fails me...i resort to metaphor way too much, i'm told.
i also wonder how much i 'walk the talk', and own the process. i wonder about my states, and stages. i go to a monthly philosopher's club and i'm the only one who has read KW, so my interpretations thus far are lonely ones. His work is thin on the ground in New Zealand, but i've got a couple of good suppliers, and of course the good ole net..
i'm in danger of being labeled an unintelligible bore. so, to spare my poor friends and families eyes from perpetual glazing, i must interact with others who can at least understand what i'm trying to get at, even if i do miss the mark, um, a bit.
(which is, i suspect, the problem-humbling indeed)
anyhow, the need to relate about integral anything has led me into the blogosphere for the first ever time...hoping discussions like this with other lone rangers might help us all?
i'm so pleased to have found the multiplex.
best
galaxie
galaxie